Definition: Of Judah, Elihu, [one] of the brethren of David: of Issachar, Omri the son of Michael:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 1 Chronicles 27:18. It’s a fascinating little snippet about the history and lineage of a group of people in ancient Israel. Here's what it means in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a specific family line within Judah, which was part of the tribe of David. It highlights a connection to two other important groups within that tribe. Let’s unpack each part: “Of Judah…” : This tells us we're talking about a group within the larger people called Judah. “…Elihu, [one] of the brethren of David:” This is where it gets interesting. "One" is key here – it means that Elihu was a member of the group. It’s not saying he was the only one. It's a little ambiguous as to whether this is a literal person or a symbolic reference. “of Issachar…” : This refers to a tribe called Issachar, located in the north of Judah. “…Omri the son of Michael:” This is the really important part! Omri was a powerful king of Israel during the time of David. He's known for being ambitious and trying to build a strong kingdom. The verse says he had a son named Michael. So, putting it all together: This verse describes a specific family line that originated in Judah, connected to both Elihu (a member of David’s group) and Issachar, who were a tribe located north of Judah. It points to a lineage that includes figures like Omri, a king who was known for his ambition and power. Why is this significant? This verse provides context for understanding the history of the Israelites and their early leaders. It shows how these groups developed and continued to influence events in the region. It’s also important because it links back to the story of David and his family. In short, it's a genealogical record that traces a specific branch within the Judah lineage, highlighting connections to prominent figures from the past. --- Do you want me to: Explain any part of this verse in more detail? Discuss the significance of this verse within the larger context of biblical history?